Neev scores your Mains answers like an examiner and gives you a fact-checked study chapter for every topic in the syllabus. A bilingual prep app for civil-services aspirants — Prelims, Mains and CSAT. Hindi and English are equal here, and we're honest about where you stand, not padded with encouragement.
Most of what makes prep material wrong is unverified answers and copied facts. Here's the part most apps skip.
Prelims MCQ answers are cross-checked against the official commission answer keys wherever one exists. Where only a coaching reproduction is available, we say so instead of passing it off as official.
An independent AI solves each question blind, without seeing the key. Any answer that disagrees is flagged for a human — never trusted silently.
Disputed questions go to a review queue instead of going live automatically. Every study chapter's decisive facts are checked against a real source, and a chapter can't publish while a single claim stays unresolved.
"Report this question" sits on every question you see. Flag a wrong answer or explanation and it lands in that same review queue.
Write a Mains answer — typed, or a photo of your handwritten pages — and get it scored against a six-dimension rubric modeled on how examiners for your exam actually grade: structure & flow, content coverage, keywords & concepts, examples & data, presentation, and word limit. Each dimension gets a score and a written reason, not just a number.
It's grounded, not guessing. Before scoring, it retrieves the syllabus content, past-year questions, and study-chapter material for your exact question and evaluates against that — then shows you a model answer and the points you missed.
And it's honest. An empty, off-topic, or copy-pasted answer is scored as exactly that. The goal is an accurate read of where you stand, not encouragement for its own sake.
Most of what makes an institute's test series work is not the questions — it is the calendar. You know months ahead which paper falls on which date, what it covers and what to read before it. Neev publishes the same thing: every paper with its date, its topics and its sources, for Prelims and Mains, on both exams we support.
The rules are the market's own, implemented exactly. A paper stays locked until its date, for everyone — that is the only thing that makes a shared rank worth reading. It opens on the date and never closes, so falling a week behind costs you the rank on that paper and nothing else. Sit it inside the ranked window and your result carries your position and the size of the cohort it was measured against; sit it later and the score, the per-question review and the topic analysis are identical, minus the rank.
Each paper is assembled shortly before it opens, so it draws on the newest approved questions in the bank, and full-length papers follow the commission's own notified pattern for question count, duration and negative marking. The series sits in Max, the top of our three plans — everything above stays where it was.
One honest sentence each — no overclaiming.
A full, fact-audited chapter for every syllabus topic — not a quick summary — that doubles as the grounding the mentor and evaluator read from.
A fresh quiz each day, mixing your weak topics, spaced-repetition PYQs, and this week's current affairs — never just a random slice.
Ask a doubt and get an answer grounded in the same chapters and PYQs you study from, with the exact source cited.
Daily summaries written in our own words, with a regional lens where your exam has one, and links back to the syllabus topics they touch.
Share an answer for peer review or ask in a discussion thread — every post is screened before others see it.
Honest progress tracking — mastery decays if you stop practicing a topic, and mock scores compare you against real cut-offs.
For a wrong answer or explanation on a specific question, use "Report this question" right on that question — it goes straight to our review queue. For anything else — your account, billing, or a bug — email us.
[email protected]